<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com">
		<title>FASTLoansForPoorCredit.com</title>
		<description>... the people have low credit rating can easily get poor credit payday loans, ... bad credit payday loans and pounds till payday at same day approval. ... Welcome to Payday loans for poor credit.</description>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</link>
	   <dc:date>2012-02-22T20:48:25+01:00</dc:date>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/4-moves-that-can-ding-your-credit.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/a-no-tax-stand-based-on-no-facts.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/argentina-credit-rating-alternative.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/credit-and-equity-traders-differ-after-moodys-cuts-japan-rating.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/do-not-let-the-debt-downgrade-scare-you.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/fitch-places-seven-banks-on-ratings-watch.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/get-over-treasuries.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/rating-agency-reform-grinds-to-a-halt.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/s-p-credit-shot-serves-as-wakeup-call.html"/>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/the-road-to-self-deception.html"/>
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/4-moves-that-can-ding-your-credit.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>4 Moves That Can Ding Your Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/4-moves-that-can-ding-your-credit.html</link>
		<description>MOST PEOPLE KNOW THAT PAYING bills late can play havoc with your credit score. But not every move that shaves points from your credit score is so obvious.

Charging a big balance to a store card. You're tempted to buy thousands of dollars' worth of furniture or appliances and charge it all to a store credit card that doesn't require payments for six months or even a year -- and sometimes longer. But debt that sits untouched could drag down your score, especially if the balance is near the card's limit, says John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education at SmartCredit .com. That's because your credit-utilization ratio -- the amount of debt you have relative to your credit limits -- is calculated for balances on individual cards as well as overall. In addition, store cards tend to charge steep rates, so if you don't pay the balance before the interest-free period is over, you will rack up big charges.

Trashing a parking ticket. Parking and speeding tickets, library fines, and other dues to the government left unpaid won't go directly to your credit report. But if they are eventually reported to a collection agency, they could damage your score. That goes for anything that could go to collections, such as unpaid rent and medical bills. And even if you pay up, collections will appear on your report for seven years.

Stuffing your wallet with cards. If you've had a handful of cards for years, they won't hurt your score. But if you open several new accounts in a short period, your score is likely to take a hit, and you may not benefit immediately from expanded credit limits.

Transferring a balance to a new card. The inquiry on your report from the new lender may shave a few points from your score, but the real...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/a-no-tax-stand-based-on-no-facts.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>A No-Tax Stand, Based on No Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/a-no-tax-stand-based-on-no-facts.html</link>
		<description>You would think that abysmal growth and jobs data, the first-ever downgrade of U.S. debt, and heart-stopping gyrations in the financial markets would impel political leaders at least to take a second look at some of their assumptions about restoring confidence in the U.S. economy. Sadly, you would be mistaken.

Whatever one thinks of the validity of Standard &amp; Poor's decision to downgrade U.S. debt, it contained an admonition that we should take seriously: Spending cuts alone won't place the debt, and by extension the economy, on a sustainable path. In a memo to his Republican colleagues, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor warned that S&amp;P's analysis put the party under &quot;pressure to compromise on tax increases&quot; on the ground that there is &quot;no other way forward.&quot; His response: &quot;I respectfully disagree.&quot;

As always, the Republican leaders justified their intransigence by invoking the demons of job-killing taxes that would suppress the dynamism of overtaxed Americans, hampering growth. This is partisan nonsense. In terms of the economy as a whole, federal taxes are at their lowest level since 1950. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that federal taxes would account for 14.8 percent of gross domestic product in 2011.

That isn't a one-year anomaly: Revenue was 14.9 percent of GDP in both 2009 and 2010. Compare that with a postwar average of about 18.5 percent of GDP, and an average of 18.2 percent during the Administration of President Ronald Reagan. Which brings us to another dubious claim: Raising taxes in a downturn hinders growth. In 1982, amid a punishing 16-month recession, Reagan approved the largest peacetime tax increase in U.S. history. A booming economy followed in 1983 and 1984, enabling him to sail to re-election.

In 1993, President Bill Clinton forced a tax increase through Congress that Representative Dick Armey, then chairman of the House Republican Conference,...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/argentina-credit-rating-alternative.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>Argentina Credit Rating Alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/argentina-credit-rating-alternative.html</link>
		<description>As US regulators look to replace references to credit ratings in their rulemaking, Argentine pension funds have already been making investments using alternative means of analysis, including reports from local universities.

But while Argentina's regulators insist the selection process is thorough, financial attorneys have their doubts that the system operates exactly as intended.

&quot;With the combination of no rating plus the political criteria for investment, the government ends up making investments the private sector would not have made,&quot; said Bruchou Fern?ndez Madero &amp; Lombardi partner Hugo Bruzone.

When the pension funds were nationalised in 2008, the rules governing investment were changed to encourage investment in outlying areas of Argentina.

Though investments in most listed companies require the rating of at least one credit agency, the country's fund authority, Administraci?n Nacional de la Seguridad Social (Anses), was given flexibility when considering certain investments.

&quot;The most important types of investments in which we are involved nowadays are those related to infrastructure and project finance in Argentina,&quot; said Anses general counsel Mar?-a Van Morlegan. &quot;In those investments we don't require a credit rating.&quot;

Instead, Van Morlegan said the pension funds must contract a national university to conduct an analysis of the investment, including how it will effect the macroeconomic situation of Argentina and how it would impact the local labour market.

Additionally, she said an investment committee relies on an internal assessment process that factors the university report into its recommendations to the Anses chief officer. The decision is then passed to a board consisting of three secretaries of state.

&quot;We have a risk management department, a strategy department, and investment department, and a number of technicians, engineers and accountants assessing the university reports and providing recommendations to the committee,&quot; Van Morlegan said.

While Bruzone expressed confidence in Morlegan's work at Anses, he said the university reports provide a subjective calculation where...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/credit-and-equity-traders-differ-after-moodys-cuts-japan-rating.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>Credit And Equity Traders Differ After Moodys Cuts Japan Rating</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/credit-and-equity-traders-differ-after-moodys-cuts-japan-rating.html</link>
		<description>Moody's downgraded Japan this week, bringing its rating in line with those from the other leading agencies by chopping the sovereign from Aa2 to Aa3. Credit traders saw that as an opportunity to sell CDS on Japanese companies, but equity investors largely ignored the move.

Moody's blamed political instability that has led to five different prime ministers in the last five years (with another on his way in), the economic consequences of the tsunami and earthquake that struck in March, weak growth prospects and the perils of deflation.

Moody's followed S&amp;P, which cut the country's ratings to AA- in January. Credit and equity markets failed to react to that move, but investors were a lot more confident at the start of the year. Equity investors again appeared to largely ignore the downgrade -- but credit traders sold CDS and pushed the iTraxx Japan CDS index up by around 15bp on Wednesday to close at 160bp, according to a credit trader.

&quot;The equity market has been rallying the last few days but that makes no sense to me at all,&quot; said a credit trader in Hong Kong. &quot;Is there any good news around? If there is, I can't see it. We are largely staying out of the market, but we have taken a few directional plays on Japan CDS today.&quot;

The Nikkei 225 closed on Wednesday only 1.07% down, falling less than both Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index and Singapore's Straits Times Index on the day. The Japanese index then bounced 1.54% the following day, closing at 8.772.36.

The downgrade does not affect the country ceiling or deposit ceiling in Japan, which Moody's still has at Aaa. But it did affect the long term issuer ratings of several big Japanese banks. Among them, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp were cut to Aa3...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/do-not-let-the-debt-downgrade-scare-you.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>Do Not Let the Debt Downgrade Scare You</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/do-not-let-the-debt-downgrade-scare-you.html</link>
		<description>The worst thing to do is panic in today's market. You can reach long-term goals if you stay the course 
ALTHOUGH IT WAS WELL-TELEGRAPHED, I WAS still plenty surprised when Standard &amp; Poor's downgraded the United States a notch from the highest credit rating AAA to AA+. But it seems I am now one voice in a growing chorus that believes Standard &amp; Poor's made a massive mistake. Some might think the rating change to be a nuanced difference, but having held the coveted AAA moniker since the inception of credit ratings 70 years ago, the U.S. downgrade was quite significant from a psychological point of view and less so from a financial point of view. I focus on the psychology because the actual report was so light in its fiscal critique--even though I readily admit we have deficit issues that must be addressed. In fact, S&amp;P's report seems to downgrade America's political system more than anything else.

If S&amp;P held the pristine reputation it once had, a stock market sell-off might have made sense. But the organization's credibility has been seriously in question since the depths of the last financial crisis when it gave AAA ratings to the toxic subprime mortgages that propelled the liquidity crisis that took our financial system to the brink in 2008. It is worth noting that as I write this column, S&amp;P's main competitors. Fitch and Moody's, have maintained their AAA ratings on the United States.

Normally, a lowered credit rating tends to cause interest rates to rise based upon a reasonable view that more risk is at hand. But so far, the opposite is occurring; interest rates for U.S. Treasuries have fallen--thereby underscoring their place in the world as the most secure investment one can make. More specifically, on those days when we have seen...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/fitch-places-seven-banks-on-ratings-watch.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>Fitch Places Seven Banks On Ratings Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/fitch-places-seven-banks-on-ratings-watch.html</link>
		<description>Fitch said after the market close that it has put seven major banks on a negative ratings watch for both long and short term debt. The banks, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley in the U.S., and Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Barclays PLC, Societe Generale and BNP Paribas in Europe, are expected to be affected by one or two ratings notches, if they are downgraded.

In a statement, Fitch cited the challenges that many banks are facing this year in their investment banking arms and amid the uncertainty the credit crisis in Europe is creating for investors as reasons for the review. Speaking about Morgan Stanley, the agency said:

Morgan Stanley is undergoing a significant strategic shift in its business, with the stated goal of reducing volatility from traditional investment banking activity and generating more stable fee income streams from Global Wealth Management.

Wealth management is a highly competitive and fragmented sector. Fitch believes it may be several years before contributions by GWM are consistently and proportionately significant.

Fitch also named volatility as a factor for its heightened attention to these investment banks, saying &quot;These seven banks are among the largest global trading and universal banks. Trading businesses exhibit high reliance on short-term wholesale funding and to varying degrees what Fitch views as more volatile earnings than commercial banking, and with more opaque risk.&quot;

This far along in the euro crisis, the ratings that these banks may actually be too high, Fitch. Could it be that their &quot;rapid innovation and interconnectedness with developments in the rest of the industry and the global economy,&quot; is exposing them to too much risk in a dangerous European economy? The banks themselves will of course beg to differ, and perhaps will as earnings reports for U.S. banks roll out over the next few weeks.

Morgan Stanley is placed on ratings watch...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/get-over-treasuries.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>Get Over Treasuries</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/get-over-treasuries.html</link>
		<description>Standard &amp; Poor's downgrade of long-term Treasury debt to AA+ is an embarrassment to the U.S. and the latest challenge to our economy's reputation for resilience. However, bond investors shouldn't get in a tizzy over the rating agency's move. Putting aside the extraordinary jump in Treasury bond prices (and the concurrent drop in yields) immediately

after the downgrade, a result of flight-to-quality buying by panicked investors, you shouldn't expect major moves in bond prices and yields in the coming months.

Still solid. S&amp;P did not consign Treasury bonds to the garbage pile or question the bedrock principle that the U.S. backs its bonds with the full faith and credit of our government. The downgrade is not a warning that the U.S. Treasury won't be able to pay its bills or that it will have trouble borrowing money. An AA+ rating shows a &quot;very strong capacity to meet financial commitments,&quot; while AAA is &quot;extremely strong,&quot; according to S&amp;P. More to the point, the Treasury, in partnership with the Federal Reserve, can create dollars or borrow from the rest of the world in U.S. currency. Swiss, German and Canadian bonds are having a wonderful run, but there aren't enough of them and other triple-A-rated alternatives to soak up all the money in search of safe, liquid income investments.

Governments, banks and insurance companies may still consider Treasuries, even with an AA+ rating, the globe's best repository for their reserves, but government bonds aren't as appealing to individual investors. In fact, savers have been disenchanted with Treasuries since the end of the 2008-09 financial crisis because of persistently low yields.

Bonnie Baha, co-director of credit research for the DoubleLine mutual funds, says she anticipated S&amp;P's move weeks before it happened. But that doesn't mean she thinks Treasury yields will rise high enough (or even at all) to...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/rating-agency-reform-grinds-to-a-halt.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>Rating Agency Reform Grinds to a Halt</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/rating-agency-reform-grinds-to-a-halt.html</link>
		<description>Despite the best efforts of US and European regulators, financial regulation experts say the market is no closer to finding an alternative to credit rating agencies.

In an IFLR web seminar on September 14, Simon Gleeson of Clifford Chance in London and Donald Lamson of Shearman &amp; Sterling agreed that while there is a strong will to reduce the financial market's dependency on ratings, a viable, concrete proposal has yet to arise.

&quot;The policymakers are between a rock and a hard place on this; while they would like there to be a third option, there doesn't appear to be one,&quot; said Gleeson.

Europe has been following the discussion in the US with some interest, said Gleeson, as the way ratings are embedded in statute means a lot of effort has gone into coming up with other options. But despite this, the US hasn't yet come up with any viable options.

Donald Lamson agreed. &quot;The lack of alternatives is one of the reasons why the rulewriting on how to eliminate where possible references to the rating agencies in regulations has come to a grinding halt,&quot; said Lamson.

&quot;There are some instances where it happens and the agencies trumpet their success in this, but not a lot in the aggregate.&quot;

Two unacceptable options 
While no alternative yet exists, regulators still insist that another way must be found.

In a press conference launching the Capital Requirements Directive 4 (CRD 4) in Brussels on July 20, EC Internal Markets commissioner Michel Barnier stated that the financial system is too dependent on ratings, and that financial institutions should have more of a say.

&quot;We are proposing to strengthen the requirements for banks to carry out their own risk analysis without resting in a mechanical fashion on the ratings agencies,&quot; said Barnier.

According to Gleeson, the debate is similar to the accounting debate after Enron,...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/s-p-credit-shot-serves-as-wakeup-call.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>S&amp;P Credit Shot Serves as Wakeup Call</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/s-p-credit-shot-serves-as-wakeup-call.html</link>
		<description>Investment strategists agree that the Standard &amp; Poor’s credit rating service fired a shot across the bow of Congress and the Obama administration with its announcement Monday of a negative outlook for the AAA debt rating of the United States.

“The national mood right now is one where people are expecting Washington to start dealing with the debt, and this (credit rating announcement) is an opportunity for the president and Congress to take some action,” said Robert Tipp, chief investment strategist of fixed income at Prudential Financial Inc.

The S&amp;P report indicated there’s a 33% chance it would downgrade U.S. debt in the next two years.

Steve Van Oder, fixed income strategist at Calvert Asset Management Co., said he believes “it was a good thing that the ratings agency brought the issue to more of a public market.”

As Mr. Tipp noted, the ratings announcement is less of an imminent threat of change in the nation’s credit quality as it is a serious wakeup call for lawmakers. The United States has never lost its AAA credit rating, but the government is running a $1.5 trillion deficit and carrying a $9 trillion debt, which adds up to a 60% debt-to-gross domestic product ratio.

“This is a consequential statement, given the extent to which the AAA rating contains borrowing costs for all of American society, but it also impacts the rest of the world which uses the dollar as a reserve currency and the most liquid bond markets in the world,” said Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive and co-chief investment officer at Pacific Investment Management Co.

“All this can be avoided if the U.S. were to converge on a common vision of medium-term fiscal adjustment and start implementing such a reform package,” Mr. El-Erian said.

Mr. Tipp saw the ratings announcement as something that lawmakers could leverage as a reason...</description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/the-road-to-self-deception.html">
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:date>2011-12-23T02:59:34+01:00</dc:date>
		<dc:source>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com</dc:source>
		<title>The Road to Self-Deception</title>
		<link>http://www.fastloansforpoorcredit.com/general/the-road-to-self-deception.html</link>
		<description>BEWARE Italian government debt. Rising yields increase the country's financing costs and make it harder for the administration to balance its--We interrupt this column for a message from the European Commission. With Italy being advised by the International Monetary Fund, negative opinions about its bonds are not helpful. The publication of this article is not permitted.

Thankfully, the EU has not decided to censor The Economist. But a European Commission draft paper on credit-rating agencies does propose that, in some circumstances, they should be barred from changing their sovereign ratings.

Let us be clear what that means. A credit rating is an opinion about the likelihood that a borrower will repay its debts. The issuers of these opinions are largely based in America, a land where free speech is constitutionally guaranteed. (Fitch has dual headquarters in New York and London, although its majority-owner is a French investor.)

Even if the EU could get away with this censorship, what purpose would it really serve? At a crucial moment the agencies would have to declare that they were unable to provide a rating of the country, as clear a signal to the markets as a downgrade itself. The authorities are worried that a ratings downgrade might cause a downward spiral, making it more difficult to rescue an embattled sovereign. But there are other trigger points. To take one example, on November 9th a surge in Italian bond yields prompted demands from clearing-houses for more collateral from those using this debt as security.

The attitude of the commission also suggests a certain paranoia that European sovereign issuers are being treated unfairly by ratings agencies. The reverse is the case. French ten-year bonds trade on a yield more than a percentage point higher than their German equivalents, even though both share a AAA rating. An analysis by Exotix,...</description>
	</item>
</rdf:RDF>

